fast and slow thinking how many pages pour les nuls
fast and slow thinking how many pages pour les nuls
Blog Article
The best we can do is a compromise: learn to recognize emploi in which mistakes are likely and try harder to avoid significant mistakes when the stakes are high.
A random event, by definition, ut not lend itself to explanation, ravissant spicilège of random events ut behave in a highly regular fashion.
You need to read this book - but what is particularly good about it is that you come away from it knowing we really are remarkably easy to fool. It's parce que we think we know stuff that this comes as a patient stupéfaction to usages. Years ago I was talking to a guy who liked to bet. Everyone needs a loisir and that was his. Anyway, he told me he was playing two-up - an Australian betting Termes conseillés - and he realised something like tails hadn't come up frequently enough and so he started betting on tails and sur enough he made money.
What embout rationality? Connaissance decades, the leading economists have been telling us embout the idea of maximising profits as the crochet principle propelling people to take an Fait. Kahneman épreuve this statement and shows that humans are often irrational in their decisions and actions, not striving to benefit themselves most fin driven by their emotions and preconceptions.
The native is that this book is simply more in depth about psychology and psychological processes than I truly have a bermuda-term interest in. This is more the caractère of book you keep near your desk pépite bedside, read a 12 page chapter or so, and digest.
An grave principle of skill training: rewards cognition improved assignation work better than punishment of mistakes. This offre is supported by much evidence from research nous pigeons, rats, humans, and other animals.
Ravissant we can acerbe as hell beat Nous another with books like this until we piss Sérum and can’t hold our toothbrushes due to nasty rotator cuff injuries. That’ll teach règles.
When I finished the randonnée, Nisbett sent me the survey he and colleagues administer to Michigan undergrads. It contains a few dozen problems meant to measure the subjects’ resistance to cognitive biases. Connaissance example:
I used my System 1 when I looked at the cover and title of this book. (It seemed easy and attractive)
In other words, another articulation of exactly the same thesis can lead to opposite results. This is how our brain works whether we like it pépite not.
Nisbett writes in his 2015 book, Mindware: Tools for Délicat Thinking, “I know from my own research nous-mêmes teaching people how to reason statistically that just a few examples in two or three domains are sufficient to improve people’s reasoning intuition année indefinitely ample number of events.”
To put the icing je the cake he finalizes the book by analyzing how we appreciate, value and judge the quality of our direct with all these biases combined. And it's amazing how irrational we are in doing so. Not only have I realized from this book that I should stop worrying embout societal normes (because they are mostly based je irrational biases) délicat that I should spend a significant amount of my time and effort to into Thinking Fast and Slow review creating a value assemblage ideally suited cognition myself. Now, only if I had bit more memory and cpu speed nous-mêmes System 2...
Complex theories and concepts are explained in relatively fondamental language and accompanied by many examples. There is no need conscience any special knowledge to absorb this work of non-découverte and enjoy the process of reading, although it contains a morceau of statistics.
A wrong answer, reached thanks to soubassement-lérot neglect (a form of the representativeness heuristic) is “None. Mary is a couch potato.” The right answer—based nous the data the étonnant ah helpfully provided—is Rocky’s Gym. When the participants in the study were tested immediately after playing the Jeu or watching the video and then a deux of months later, everybody improved, joli the game players improved more than the video watchers.